Proceedings of the
9th International Symposium for Geotechnical Safety and Risk (ISGSR)
25 – 28 August 2025, Oslo, Norway
Editors: Zhongqiang Liu, Jian Dai and Kate Robinson
Climate-Adaptivity of Landslide Risk Mitigation Measures: Framework and Preliminary Validation
1Dept. of Natural Hazards/Geotechnics and Environment, NGI, Norway.
2Dept. of Civil, Environmental, Land, Construction and Chemistry, POLIBA, Italy
3School of Engineering, University of Florence, Italy
4Inst. of Geotechnics, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
5Dept. of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Eng., POLITO, Italy
6Safe and Resilient Infrastructure, Deltares, The Netherlands
7Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Eng. and Architecture, University of Maribor, Slovenia
8Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Sweden
9Laboratoire Sols, Roches et Ouvrages Géotechniques, Université Gustave Eiffel, France
ABSTRACT
It is increasingly recognized that climate change significantly impacts civil society, as evidenced by the rise in climate-driven hazards (e.g., rainfall-induced landslides). Therefore, it is important for engineers to explore climate-adaptive and regenerative landslide risk mitigation options, employed stand-alone or in combination with conventional engineering solutions.In this paper the Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) group of the European Large Geotechnical Institutes Platform (ELGIP) presents the preliminary results of a study on assessing the feasibility of applying nature-based solutions (NbS) as climate-adaptive landslide risk mitigation measures. The basis for this study relies on the outcomes from a previous study conducted by the CCA working group regarding the adaptivity of geo-structures to climate change effects. The paper proposes a three-level sequential evaluation system to assign scores to the climate-adaptiveness of the NbS included in the LaRiMiT (Landslide Risk Mitigation Toolbox) database, a web-based platform for the case-specific selection of landslide risk mitigation measures. The conceptual standpoints and preliminary results from applying the three-level scoring process are presented and assessed critically.
Keywords: Geohazards, Landslides, Climate change adaptivity, Risk mitigation, Experts scoring, Nature-based solutions.

