<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<doi>R01-02-110-cd</doi>
<front><journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comparing Distributed and Integrated Hazard Analysis Environments</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>Axel Berres<sup>a</sup>, Sascha L&#252;bbe<sup>b</sup>, Michael Sch&#228;fer<sup>c</sup>, and Viola Voth<sup>d</sup>  </author>

<aff>German Aerospace Center, Germany. </aff>

<email><a href="mailto:Axel.Berres@dlr.de"><sup>a</sup>Axel.Berres@dlr.de</a></email>

<email><a href="mailto:Sascha.Luebbe@dlr.de"><sup>b</sup>Sascha.Luebbe@dlr.de</a></email>

<email><a href="mailto:Michael.Schaefer@dlr.de"><sup>c</sup>Michael.Schaefer@dlr.de</a></email>

<email><a href="mailto:Viola.Voth@dlr.de "><sup>d</sup>Viola.Voth@dlr.de </a></email>

</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>Based on aeronautics projects, two different hazard analysis approaches for using ARP4754A are compared. An integrated and a distributed environment approach are introduced and each project is allocated to one of them. The experiences made with both approach implementations were described. In addition, a discussion of the analysis, process, and tools used is given from a holistic perspective. It was disclosed, that a successful implementation depends on the infrastructure, the tool availability and the desired reusability degree of engineering knowledge.</p><p>  <italic>Keywords: </italic>Functional hazard, Hazard analysis, Safety assessment, Integrated development, Distributed development. </p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>R01-02-110</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>
