<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>International Journal of Aerospace and Lightweight Structures</journal-id>
<publication_date>2013</publication_date>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<doi>10.3850/S2010428613000640</doi>
<article-title>Comparison of PIM and RPIM Solutions of Elasto-Plastic Thick Beams</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>Bahattin Kanbera<sup>a</sup> and Nurettin Furkan Dogan<sup>b</sup></author>

<author-citation>Kanber, Bahattin; Dogan, Nurettin Furkan</author-citation>

<aff>Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, 27310, Turkey.</aff>

<email><a href="mailto:kanber@gantep.edu.tr"><sup>a</sup>kanber@gantep.edu.tr</a></email>


<email><a href="mailto:nfurkandogan@gantep.edu.tr"><sup>b</sup>nfurkandogan@gantep.edu.tr</a></email>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>In this study, the point interpolation method (PIM) and radial point interpolation
method (RPIM) solutions of elasto-plastic thick beams are compared by using standard
Gaussian integration and a nodal integration based on Taylor series expansion. The
effects of integration schemes, support domain sizes and RPIM shape parameters on the
solution convergence are also investigated after yield point. The global weak form is used
to obtain nodal stiffness matrixes. A simply supported beam with constant strength is
solved by considering an elasto-plastic hardening material. Its results are compared with
finite element solutions in ANSYS.</p>


<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>PIM, RPIM, Elasto-plastic, Meshfree, Thick beams.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>S2010428613000640</hpdf>
<nsref>../protected_docs/0302/S2010428613000640.pdf</nsref>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>

